Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Could A Man Be Found Carrying Water In Jerusalem?

At least 250 years before the Book of Hebrews was written, a group of Jews including some of the priests decided to create their own priesthood after the line of Malkizedek. They were known as the Essenes. We also know them as the writers of the Qumran Scrolls or the Dead Sea Sect.

The village of the Essenes was in the city of Jerusalem. Their location is significant when coupled with their strict adherence to the Torah. In the Torah, God tells the Israelites that they are not to have a bowel movement in the camp while traveling through the desert on the way to the Promised Land. The Essenes believed that God’s Word never loses meaning or significance, therefore, they believed that even though they were no longer in the desert, there must still be a camp. They believed that the new camp was Jerusalem.

Because they lived in city of Jerusalem and considered it the camp of God’s people, they believed that they were not allowed to have a bowel movement in Jerusalem. This meant that they would have to designate a place outside the city where they could use the bathroom. In 1991 archeologists discovered the Essene Gate. They were boggled by its location because it seemingly led to nowhere. Then they realized that the gate served as an entrance to the woods and out of the city. It was their bathroom door.

Another interesting fact about the Essene sect was that they also held strictly to their priestly duties and would not allow women to do any kind of work within their village because of its location in Jerusalem. The normal custom of women doing things such as carrying water was not allowed in the Essene village.

In the world of Jesus, it would be inconceivable to expect a man to carry a water jar, except among the Essenes.

“On the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, when it was customary to sacrifice the Passover lamb, Jesus’ disciples asked him, ‘Where do you want us to go and make preparations for you to eat the Passover?’ So he sent two of his disciples, telling them, ‘Go into the city (Jerusalem) and a man carrying a jar of water will meet you. Follow him. Say to the owner of the house he enters, ‘The Teacher asks: Where is my guest room, where I may eat the Passover with my disciples?’ He will show you a large upper room, furnished and ready. Make preparations for us there.’ The disciples left, went into the city and found things just as Jesus had told them. So they prepared the Passover.” (Mark 14:12-16)

Sermon after sermon teaches that finding a man carrying water in Jerusalem was a miracle in itself. This would be true, except for the men of the Essene village in Jerusalem.

Jesus was not telling his disciples to look for the impossible, but to travel to the Essene village and prepare the Passover.

Forever learning,
Johnny

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Walker said:

Is there a particular reason he would have wanted to do Passover among the Essenes?

Carrying forward from the last thread, I see no reason to not believe that, then as well as now, there was political significance (maybe just in the minds of others) in the actions of all notable people.

"Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose."

Alphonse Karr, Les Guêpes 1849

Namaste

Johnny said...

Walker,

I have not discovered the exact reason yet. However, it makes sense that among these pious believers who rejected the corruption of the Temple priesthood in Jesus' day, that Jesus would find solace among these passionate Jews who longed for the redemption of the world.

Maybe Jesus felt more at home among the Essenes because of their strict adherence to the Word of God. After all, it is believed that John the Baptist was also an Essene.

Regardless, this subject sheds great light on the activities of Jesus and his followers as he prepared to be the Sacrificial Lamb.

I'll keep searching.

Thanks, Walker.

Ang said...

Thank you for this. I had heard that men did not usually carry water but I had not heard about this. I had heard about the Essenes as well, but not really known much about them.

I'll be referencing this post on my blog tomorrow.

Johnny said...

Hey Angela,

Thanks. Be sure to lead them to www.followtherabbi.com as well. Ray Vander Laan provides many of the isights and historical facts that I am sharing.

Thanks again.

Johnny

Anonymous said...

Walker Said:

Sorry,I changed my email and can't find an email link for you:

I don't expect any spam spiders ere, but what the heck:

rjw.walker{noSpam}@gmail.com

Happy Easter!

Anonymous said...

Walker Said:

I think if Igor could see my brain twitching, he would gasp: "It's alive, master, the monster is ALIVE!"

(Making allowances for my miserable Biblical scholarship,) there are few references in the Bible to the Sadduces, almost none to the Zealots, and none I can find to the Essenes.

From what I have read here and elsewhere, Jesus was probably closest in philosophy and world view and temperament to the Pharisees

And yet it is the Pharisees who are regularly held up as "opposed to" Jesus.

The be-robed spin masters at work?

In the 1960's, when the "New Left" was raising its urgent head, it didn't put the right wing under scrutiny: it went after the "old left."

Groups form and prosper, in part, because they find common causes: and a common enemy is frequently one of those.

And, when there is a similar group in competition for recruits*, is it not human nature to set that group apart in the battle for like minded folks who could go either way?

Question: Would Christ say (today) "Think outside the box?"

Or would he draw a square in the sand and keep poking his stick on the outside of of that figure?

Namaste

---------------
FWIW: *A mega church near me has a billboard: "Boycott C.... Creek" in huge type. In smaller type below: it's 'signed' by "Satan."

Johnny said...

Hey Walker,

We typically criticize those whom we consider part of us. We give our most urgent and often critiques to our families, co-workers, denominational brothers and sisters, country leaders, et cetera.

According to people like Brad H. Young, Ray Vander Laan, David Bivin, and others, Jesus was so critical of the Pharisees because they were of the same mind as Jesus, but were missing the important attribute of humility.

Secondly, Jesus was not speaking of or to all Pharisees, but only to those whom he and other Jews of his day considered hypocrites.

Remembering that there were 7 kinds of Pharisees, five of them considered hypocritical and 2 who were the godly teachers of the Jews, gives us this information.

The other issue that I, those listed above, and others would put forth is that the value of Jewish antiquity cannot be ignored if we are to truly understand Jesus.

Time and time again I have heard or read where people say, "The Bible doesn't mention" and that is correct. We have a great need of ancient Jewish writings which have preserved the culture and context of the world of the Bible, much of which the Bible never mentions. This will include subjects that without them will hinder our interpretations of Jesus' world and words like the Oral Torah, the clothing of Jesus, how one became a disciple, and many Hebrew idioms.

Thanks for your comment, Walker.

It is always my pleasure to read your words.

Grace and peace,
Johnny